In addition to our weekly football phrases, we sometimes have a football language coming back into the media, and today we look at some of the language associated with Roy Hodgson`s dismissal as Liverpool boss. You will find many other examples here on our page of football phrases, here on the clichés of football and in our vast glossary of football. FC Chelsea and Jose Mourinho have parted ways today. t.co/YYJaxxdE36 Les Parisiens insist that this stage has nothing to do with the fact that she performed this week on a reality show in Spain. PSG are hopeful of signing a break with the Spaniard, but if they don`t, Jesé will have to return to training with the club. Chelsea announced on Thursday afternoon that Jose Mourinho had left the association “by mutual agreement.” This type of agreement is different from third party ownership, since the player`s contract is held by a non-football entity, z.B of a management company. The big football phrase of the day is to leave the club by mutual agreement, thanks to the story that Roy Hodgson has left his post as manager of Liverpool FC. Sometimes managers are fired or fired for poor performance; other times they resign or want to go elsewhere, but this expression suggests that both parties, Hodgson and the owners, have agreed on this decision. In fact, Liverpool`s owners were quoted on the club`s website as saying that “both parties thought, in the best interest of the club, that he was backing down.” However, as Hodgson is under a lot of pressure because of the team`s weak position and media speculation indicates that his position was untenable, this sentence could be a more beautiful way of explaining that he was indeed fired.
He is not the first manager to leave Liverpool in such circumstances, former boss Rafael Benitez also leaves Liverpool FC by mutual agreement. If we have more concrete knowledge about the return to the 2019/20 season or the start of the 2020/21 season, we will reconsider our position on the management structure of football. In the meantime, applications for one of the positions are not reviewed or reviewed. For example, the DRC`s decision of 2 November 2007 No. 31113 confirmed that a clause allowing the association to unilaterally terminate the contract at any time and pay compensation was not valid. According to the Democratic Republic of Congo, the result would be a disproportionate redistricting of the rights of the parties to an employment contract, to the detriment of the actor. (See also the DRC of 22 July 2004, no